$2,000,000 Individual Versus Business | No Flotation Device

November 15, 2017

$2,000,000 Individual Versus Business | No Flotation Device


In October, 2016 Attorneys Arash Homampour and Scott Boyer settled an Individual versus Business | No Flotation Device case for $2 million against the Defendant.

On Sept. 5, 2011, Plaintiff, and his wife, rented a canoe from Defendant to use at Shaver Lake in Fresno. While boating around the lake the canoe capsized and Plaintiff’s wife drowned. Both Plaintiff and the Decedent had signed written waivers of liability, and had been offered, but rejected life vests before they used the canoe.

Plaintiff, and the Decedent’s son, sued Defendant, which rented the canoe, and Southern California Edison Co., which owned the land and had a licensing agreement with Defendant.

Plaintiff’s Contentions

Plaintiff contended that federal and state law required Defendant to equip each rented canoe with one personal flotation device per person on board, and Decedent drowned because the canoe, which Plaintiff and the Decedent rented was not equipped with a personal flotation device.

Plaintiffs claimed that Southern California Edison Co. had contractual and legal duties to ensure that its licensees followed the law.

Defendant’s Contentions

Defendants claimed that the liability waiver signed by Plaintiff and the Decedent was an absolute bar to Plaintiffs’ claims. Plaintiff and Decedent had expressly, and implicitly, assumed the risk by refusing personal flotation devices and the federal and state laws mandating use of personal flotation devices applied to the user and not the renter of the canoe. Defendants also claimed that Plaintiff was responsible for causing the canoe to capsize.

Southern California Edison claimed that it was not vicariously liable for the acts of its licensee.


Plaintiffs sought wrongful death damages. Plaintiff also sought emotional distress damages from witnessing the Decedent’s drowning.


The Homampour team were able to settle with the Defendants for $2 million policy limits. Southern California Edison, Co. did not contribute any funds to the settlement. Although this allowed the Homampour team to secure a sizable figure for the Plaintiffs, it can not replace the loss of a wife and mother.

Image Credit: Unsplash

To talk to one of our Los Angeles personal injury lawyers, call 323-658-8077. Or, if you prefer, send us an email by clicking on the red button below.

Send Us an Email

  • Initial consultations are free and we take cases on a contingency โ€” which means there is no fee if there is no recovery.
  • Our multilingual staff speaks Spanish, Farsi and Armenian.
  • We also can handle complex cases via attorney referral.
Arash Homampour awarded OCTLA 2018 Top Gun Trial Lawyer of The Year - Products Liability
Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles - Past Board Member
American Association for Justice Leaders Forum Patron
CAOC - Consumer Attorneys of California Member
Arash Homampour โ€“ Named in 2023 Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers guide
U.S. News Best Law Firms 2023
Arash named by the Ventura County Trial Lawyers Association as their Trial Lawyer of the year 2016
10 out 10 Superb rating at AVVO.com
Daily Journal - Named as Top 30 Plaintiff's Attorneys in California - 2016
Super Lawyer since 2005 and one of the Top 10 Super Lawyers in Southern California since 2021

Enquiry Form



    A brief description of your legal issue

    Disclaimer *

    The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

    Privacy Policy