Arash Homampour – Top 30 Plaintiff Lawyer In California

September 15, 2016

Arash Homampour – Top 30 Plaintiff Lawyer In California

Daily Journal

“Homampour said 2015 was “my best year ever” because he attained five multimillion dollar jury awards for clients, including one for $59.3 million that was the state’s top plaintiff’s verdict by dollar

This year, he’s back in action with another potential blockbuster suit that accuses Toyota Motor Corp. of selling vehicles with defective braking systems, following a Prius that allegedly could not stop in time to avoid striking three minor students in a North Hollywood crosswalk. T.S. v. Toyota Motor Corp., BC615438 (L.A. Super. Ct., filed March 30, 2016)

Last year’s wins including a federal jury awarding Amy Shinedling’s survivors $59.3 million after she was killed by a Sunbeam space heater whose auto shut-off mechanism failed to trigger when clothing near the appliance caught fire.  Shinedling v. Sunbeam Products Inc., 12-CV438 (C.D. Cal., filed March 27, 2012)

Homampour said his winning strategy was to show jurors that the defendant’s engineers knew of a key fact hidden from consumers: that the switch was defective and was likely incapable of preventing a fire.

He lashed out at his opposition.  “A grossly obnoxious [Sunbeam] insurance company undervalued this case and offered $5,000 through under-performing defense attorneys,” he said.  “They appeared to think my past experience was a fluke, or they underestimated what a lawyer can do with facts.”

Homampour showed what he can do when he persuaded a different federal jury to order Allstate Insurance Co. to pay $14 million in an underlying catastrophic injury case after finding the company acted unreasonably during settlement talks with the crash victim.  An Allstate adjuster first accepted then refused the plaintiff’s demand for the $100,000 policy limit and instead offered $34,000 to a motorcyclist rendered paraplegic when struck by an Allstate-insured driver.  Allstate’s waffling constituted a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, Homampour argued.  Madrigal v. Allstate Insurance Co,. 14-CV04242 (C.D. Cal., filed June 2, 2014)

And so it went with Homampour’s other 2015 wins, including $14 million from CalTrans for the family of a motorcyclist killed in a blind-turn crash on a Ventura County back road, after Homampour showed the state created a dangerous condition by failing to install advisory highway signs to warn drivers.  Shanks v. State of California, 56-2012-00423044 (Ventura Super. Ct., filed Aug. 22, 2012)

“How you win a case is by proper framing,” Homampour said. “I weave the story throughout the case.  The other side tends to be arrogant and frame it differently, but jurors can tell the difference.”

Originally published in Supplement to the Los Angeles and San Francisco Daily Journal, June 15, 2016

— John Roemer

To talk to one of our Los Angeles personal injury lawyers, call 323-658-8077. Or, if you prefer, send us an email by clicking on the red button below.

Send Us an Email

  • Initial consultations are free and we take cases on a contingency — which means there is no fee if there is no recovery.
  • Our multilingual staff speaks Spanish, Farsi and Armenian.
  • We also can handle complex cases via attorney referral.
Arash Homampour awarded OCTLA 2018 Top Gun Trial Lawyer of The Year - Products Liability
Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles - Past Board Member
American Association for Justice Leaders Forum Patron
CAOC - Consumer Attorneys of California Member
Arash Homampour – Named in 2023 Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers guide
U.S. News Best Law Firms 2023
Arash named by the Ventura County Trial Lawyers Association as their Trial Lawyer of the year 2016
10 out 10 Superb rating at
Daily Journal - Named as Top 30 Plaintiff's Attorneys in California - 2016
Super Lawyer since 2005 and one of the Top 10 Super Lawyers in Southern California since 2021

Enquiry Form



    A brief description of your legal issue

    Disclaimer *

    The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

    Privacy Policy